Recent searches
Search options
Administered by:
@wdlindsy@toad.social"News yesterday that a majority of justices on the Supreme Court would keep the abortion drug mifepristone legal, at least for the time being, was good for reproductive rights and frankly, the rule of law. But that this ever should have been a question is proof of how normalized once laughably fringe legal theories have become in our current judicial environment."
~ Elliot Kirschner and Dan Rather
"The unhinged rationale behind this case, that somehow the FDA’s approval of a drug with decades of exemplary safety data could be tossed aside by a reactionary Trump-appointed judge with an anti-abortion vendetta, shows the rot of a system stacked with right-wing political actors wielding legal opinions in place of legislation and impervious to the will of the voters."
@Language1230 Yes, this is great commentary, isn't it?
@wdlindsy “But as is often the case with the current Republican Party, the scale of projection is enough to open a chain of movie theaters. The message, simply, is ‘activism is fine for me but not for thee.’”
@megmuttonhead Yes, an excellent statement.