Do you like Noam Chomsky?
Do you like Noam Chomsky?
Just received "Noam Chomsky On Anarchism"!
It's also available for free at The Anarchist @library:
- https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/noam-chomsky-on-anarchism
#politics #society #capitalism #socialism #ukpol
"With the development of industrial capitalism, a new and unanticipated system of injustice, it is libertarian socialism that has preserved and extended the radical humanist message of the Enlightenment and the classical liberal ideals that were perverted into an ideology to sustain the emerging social order."
-- Noam Chomsky
Thanks to @anarchistquotes
#chomsky a particular favourite of mine. Tells it like it is. n.b. the phrasing.
From my feed. #Chomsky at 23.00 hrs, can't be all bad!
In certain intellectual circles in France, the very basis for discussion -- minimal respect for facts and logic -- has been virtually abandoned.
-- Noam Chomsky
Ok once more. Do NOT quote Noam Chomsky to me as any kind of oracle on anything. I shall post this each time one of my followers does the "Chomsky Is a Good and Wise Man"-thing. He is not.
"The responsibility of intellectuals is to speak the truth and expose lies."
–Noam Chomsky
#Chomsky emphasizes that those who have knowledge and influence must use their intellect to challenge falsehoods and reveal the truth. Intellectuals, whether scholars, journalists, or thinkers, have a duty to question power structures and educate the public. Silence in the face of deception allows misinformation to spread unchecked.
Just ordered Noam Chomsky's "On Anarchism" while in bed.
- ISBN Search: https://isbnsearch.org/isbn/9781595589101
Also freely available on @library:
- The Anarchist Library: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/noam-chomsky-on-anarchism
"As long as the general population is passive, apathetic, diverted to consumerism or hatred of the vulnerable, then the powerful can do as they please, and those who survive will be left to contemplate the outcome."
— Noam Chomsky
Noam Chomsky, a renowned linguist, philosopher, and public intellectual, has significantly impacted society in various ways:
*Linguistics and Cognitive Science*
1. *Transformational Generative Grammar*: Chomsky revolutionized linguistics with his theory, which posits that language is innate and governed by universal rules.
2. *Cognitive Science*: His work laid the foundation for cognitive science, an interdisciplinary field that studies the human mind and its processes.
*Politics and Social Issues*
1. *Critique of Power and Propaganda*: Chomsky has been an outspoken critic of power structures, highlighting the role of media and propaganda in shaping public opinion.
2. *Anti-War Activism*: He has been a vocal opponent of imperialism, militarism, and wars, advocating for peaceful resolution of conflicts.
3. *Support for Human Rights and Social Justice*: Chomsky has consistently supported human rights, social justice, and grassroots movements, often speaking out against oppression and inequality.
*Education and Critical Thinking*
1. *Promoting Critical Thinking*: Chomsky has emphasized the importance of critical thinking, encouraging people to question authority and challenge dominant narratives.
2. *Education as Empowerment*: He has advocated for education as a means of empowering individuals and communities, rather than merely serving the interests of power.
*Media and Culture*
1. *Media Critique*: Chomsky's work has highlighted the role of media in shaping public opinion and perpetuating power structures.
2. *Influence on Alternative Media*: His ideas have inspired alternative media outlets and independent journalists, promoting a more diverse and critical media landscape.
Overall, Chomsky's impact on society has been profound, influencing fields from linguistics to politics, education, and media. His commitment to critical thinking, social justice, and human rights continues to inspire new generations of scholars, activists, and thinkers.
(Source: Unclear/Consider one of Chomsky's most celebrated books: How the World Works https://amzn.to/3DgWCO6
"If we choose to take seriously the overwhelming consensus position of credible climate scientists, we have to accept that climate change represents a truly existential threat to the continuation of life on Earth as we know it.
Given this reality, it is not the least bit surprising that Noam Chomsky has been committed to educating the broadest possible global audience on the basic science behind the climate crisis, the factors that have produced the crisis, and how to advance a viable path forward for reversing the crisis.
It is also not surprising that Chomsky understands the crisis as a severe malignancy of contemporary neoliberal capitalism and that, correspondingly, the work of reversing the crisis will require mass popular mobilization to defeat neoliberalism under the combined banners of social justice and ecological sanity.
Of course, Chomsky’s profoundly impactful research contributions, spanning over seven decades, have primarily covered the fields of linguistics, philosophy, psychology, and cognitive science. He has never claimed to be an expert on the technical details of climate science or the economics of building an alternative clean energy system.
At the same time, Chomsky, legendarily, is a man who “reads everything.” And he does not merely read everything. Rather, over decades, Chomsky has demonstrated a breathtaking ability to absorb a huge range of material on critically important social and political issues. He is then equally capable of explaining these issues to millions of readers throughout the world through his unparalleled combination of moral passion, rigor, depth of insight, clarity, as well as — when he chooses to unleash it — bracing rhetoric force.
These are exactly the qualities that Chomsky has brought to bear in addressing the climate crisis. His contributions are critical for understanding the crisis..."
https://jacobin.com/2025/03/noam-chomsky-neoliberalism-climate-crisis
Interview d’un des plus grands intellectuels du XXIème siècle : Noam #Chomsky https://lareleveetlapeste.fr/noam-chomsky-a-ce-moment-de-lhistoire-nous-devons-decider-si-la-vie-humaine-peut-continuer/
"Ils appellent ça le libertarianisme. On doit laisser libres les maîtres, les propriétaires, ceux qui amassent l'essentiel du capital. Ils doivent être libres de détruire le monde aussi vite qu'ils le veulent. Les institutions fondamentales sont suicidaires. Le capitalisme est un arrêt de mort, c'est évident."
Revisiting ‘The Responsibility of Intellectuals’ by Noam Chomsky https://open.substack.com/pub/proletarianperspective/p/revisiting-the-responsibility-of?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=3abyrk #chomsky #anarchism #imperialism #endofhistory
Chasing Noam Chomsky is Futile
His great ideas have had 35 years to percolate. Something went wrong:
https://tiereddemocraticgovernance.org/blog_details.php?blog_cat_id=20&id=255
“Manufacturing Consent”
… for fascism
“If the triumph of communism
is the worst imaginable result,
the support of fascism abroad
is justified as a lesser evil.”
In 1988, just before the destruction of the USSR, #Herman and #Chomsky published a theory on the use of mass media “to inculcate individuals with the values, beliefs, and codes of behavior” that “integrate them into the institutional structures of the larger society.” (p.1.) The media’s “societal purpose,” they explained, is to “defend the economic, social, and political agenda of privileged groups that dominate the domestic society and the state.” (p.298.)
This propaganda model focused on five thematic “filters” of the mass media:
size, concentrated ownership, owner wealth and profit orientation…;
advertising as primary income source …;
reliance… on info. provided by government, business and “experts” funded and approved by these primary sources and agents of power;
“flak” as a means of disciplining the media;
“anticommunism” as a national religion and control mechanism. (p.2.)
With the “specter” of communism as “the ultimate evil,” the media created a “cultural milieu in which anticommunism is the dominant religion.” By “elevating opposition to communism to a first principle of Western ideology and politics,” the media used it as a “potent” “political-control mechanism.” This “fragment[ed] the left and labor movements” and sidelined “social democrats” accused of being “too soft on communists.” While many Cold War “liberal” progressives supported US-led wars justified with anticommunist pretexts, “others lapsed into silence, paralyzed by the fear of being tarred with charges of infidelity to the national religion.” (p.29.)
By stirring “anti-Communist fervor … the demand for serious evidence in support of claims of ‘communist’ abuses is suspended, and charlatans can survive as evidential sources.” These “charlatans” take “center stage” as media “experts” and “remain there even after exposure as highly unreliable, if not downright liars.” (p.30.)
Source: Edward S.Herman and Noam Chomsky, Manufacturing Consent, 1988.
Source: Ukraine: A Captive but Unconquerable Nation, Bulletin of the World AntiCommunist League, Jun 1969
#Chomsky about #Capitalism and #Family, he is right now what?
need a #newsystem that is better than the #oldsystem or #mankind is doomed
So I've read a bit of #Bookchin 's #PostScarcity (riddled with historical errors), and then a good chunk of #Woodcock 's #Anarchism (more interesting, but not convincing), and finally #Chomsky 's #OnAnarchism (the sweet spot).
Chomsky isn't dogmatic. He lives in the real world and makes pragmatic arguments. Dismantling the state is an ultimate goal, but if you go straight for that, a) people get hurt in the meantime, and b) you fail anyway. Chomsky's anarchism is what I can identify with.
Never suspected I will see Steve Witkoff, right-wing #Trump diehard anti-communist speak literal #Chomsky, far-left Soviet and Russian apologist
The war didn’t need to happen. It was provoked. It doesn’t necessarily mean it was provoked by the Russians. There were all kinds of conversations back then about Ukraine joining NATO. That didn’t need to happen. It basically became a threat to the Russians.
As a reminder, no “conversations” about #NATO would ever happen if #Russia had not been threatening newly liberated Eastern European countries with return of Eastern Bloc regime all 1990’s. This was literally the only reason why these countries joined NATO in 1997-2004. It was Russia’s invasion on neutral and non-aligned Ukraine in 2014 that made it to add the goal of joining NATO in 2019. And it was Russia’s 2022 invasion on Ukraine that made #Finland and #Sweden join NATO. So let’s not mistake the cause and effect here…