toad.social

Matti Järvinen“Direct capture is a scam, carbon capture is a scam, blue hydrogen is a scam, and electrofuel is a scam. These are all scam technologies that do nothing for the climate or air pollution,” says a professor of civil and environmental engineering.<a href="https://heimildin.is/grein/24581/climeworks-capture-fails-to-cover-its-own-emissions/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://heimildin.is/grein/24581/climeworks-capture-fails-to-cover-its-own-emissions/</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ClimateChange" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ClimateChange</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/CCS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#CCS</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ClimeWorks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ClimeWorks</a>

Extinction Rebellion München🧊 <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/Climeworks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Climeworks</a> sollte eigentlich jährlich Tausende Tonnen CO₂ aus der Luft holen - stattdessen hinkt die Technik hinterher: Nur 105 Tonnen in 10 Monaten, bei einem Ziel von 36.000. Gleichzeitig entstehen dabei selbst CO₂-Emissionen. 😬💸 Unternehmen verkaufen heute schon CO₂-Zertifikate für Leistungen, die sie erst in Zukunft vielleicht erbringen können.👉 Fazit: Im Kampf gegen die <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/Klimakrise" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Klimakrise</a> dürfen wir uns nicht auf Wetten mit Zukunftstechnologien verlassen. Was wir brauchen, sind echte Emissionsreduktionen und zwar jetzt, nicht irgendwann. 🌍✊<a href="https://heimildin.is/grein/24581/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://heimildin.is/grein/24581/</a><a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/StopptFossileSubventionen" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#StopptFossileSubventionen</a>

O=C=OSchweizer CO₂-Pionier Climeworks steht vor MassenentlassungDas Schweizer Unternehmen <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/Climeworks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Climeworks</a> gilt als Vorzeigeprojekt für technische Lösungen im Kampf gegen die <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/Erderw%C3%A4rmung" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Erderwärmung</a>. Jetzt steckt das ETH-Spin-off in einer Krise.Das Schweizer <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/StartUp" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#StartUp</a> Climeworks filtert mit seinen Maschinen <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/CO2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#CO2</a> direkt aus der Luft. Mit dieser Idee hat das Unternehmen nicht nur internationale Anerkennung gewonnen, sondern auch rund 810 Millionen US-Dollar an Investorengeldern. Nun aber muss Climeworks Angestellte entlassen.In <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/Island" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Island</a> betreibt Climeworks zwei Anlagen. Beide sollten Vorzeigeprojekte sein, doch die Realität hinkt hinterher. Laut dem isländischen Investigativjournalisten Bjartmar Alexandersson liegen beide weit unter den Versprechungen: «Wir haben herausgefunden, dass die Zahlen keinen Sinn ergeben. Sie behaupten, mehr CO₂ einzufangen, als sie tatsächlich tun.» Eine der Anlagen solle fähig sein, über 36’000 Tonnen pro Jahr aus der Atmosphäre einzufangen. Im ersten Jahr waren es laut dem Journalisten nur 105 Tonnen.Laut <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/SRF" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#SRF</a> hat das Unternehmen ein Konsultationsverfahren eingeleitet – ein Schritt, der <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/Massenentlassungen" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Massenentlassungen</a> vorausgeht. Mindestens 10 Prozent der 498 Angestellten wird gekündigt. Laut dem Unternehmen werden es wohl deutlich mehr als 10 Prozent sein.<a href="https://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/climeworks-co2-pionier-climeworks-steht-vor-massenentlassung-334700548663" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/climeworks-co2-pionier-climeworks-steht-vor-massenentlassung-334700548663</a><a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/Klimakatastrophe" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Klimakatastrophe</a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/CCS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#CCS</a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/Kapitalismus" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Kapitalismus</a>

awpClimeworks-CEO: "Hauptproblem ist Käufer für Zertifikate zu finden"Der Klima-Hoffnungsträger Climeworks hat Mühe, seine nächste Anlage zu finanzieren. Mitgründer und Co-Geschäftsführer Christoph Gebald erklärt im Interview, warum das Schweizer "Unicorn" nun auf Portfolios mit Aufforstung setzt und wieso das Projekt in den USA ohne US-Finanzierung scheitern könnte. <a href="https://awp.news/tags/UBS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#UBS</a> <a href="https://awp.news/tags/Climeworks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Climeworks</a> <a href="https://awp.news/tags/news" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#news</a><a href="https://www.awp.ch/sharedarticles?articleid=-1992758234" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.awp.ch/sharedarticles?articleid=-1992758234</a>

anlomedad<a href="https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2010GL042858" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2010GL042858</a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/Chiodini" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Chiodini</a> et al 2010Mefite d'Ansanto, Italy is the den of the goddess Mefite, acc to Roman lore. She burps nearly 1Mt CO2 annually and the area is unsafe for animals & humans due to high CO2 concentrations.1Mt/a is what ClimeWorks says their CCS in Iceland removes by 2030...Dunno if the uptick of volcanic activity due to <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/ClimateChange" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ClimateChange</a> (post-glacial rebound) is going to threaten the CCS installation. It is the uptick in volcanic activity which had me search for papers, and come across this particular one. Because I wonder whether volcanos can become a carbon bomb. After all, it is said that CO2 from volcanos played a major role when Earth climbed out of ice ages. They're coming alive in post-glacial rebound and <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/SeaLevelRise" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#SeaLevelRise</a> triggers near-coastal volcano eruptions. At the moment, volcanos contribute an estimated 350Mt/a CO2. A 10-fold increase in volcanic degassing would take 30 years for +0.1°C when 100 to 150Gt CO2 equal +0.1°C.<a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/CCS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#CCS</a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/CO2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#CO2</a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/ClimeWorks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ClimeWorks</a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/Iceland" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Iceland</a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/Volcano" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Volcano</a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/volcanism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#volcanism</a>

anlomedad<a href="https://sueden.social/@scuba_zeus" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@scuba_zeus</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/@mkreutzfeldt" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@mkreutzfeldt</a> Na, die Regel passt aber nicht im Zusammenhang mit CO2-Emissionen. Das CO2, das emittiert wird, bleibt im System. Und wirkt. <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/Climeworks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Climeworks</a> sagt, ab 2030 können sie 1 Millionen Tonnen CO2 pro Jahr aus der Luft holen und in Stein binden. 1 Millionen. Im Jahr. Es werden aber derzeit 40 Milliarden Tonnen jedes Jahr emittiert, wovon die Hälfte sofort in der Atmosphäre landet. Was wir heute zuviel emittieren, bleibt also in der Atmo. Unternehmen wie Climeworks können das nicht in nennenswerter Menge und in einem bedeutsamen Zeitfenster rausholen. 1 Millionen vs 40 Milliarden... Im JAHR.Und die andere Hälfte, die derzeit noch netterweise in Kohlenstoffsenken geparkt wird, ist dort auch nicht sicher, sondern nur ... tja, geparkt halt. Siehe Waldbrände, die all das verbaute fossile CO2 wieder freilassen. Unkenrufe zu übergehen ist in diesem Bereich tödlich. Unkontrolliert, nur mit Beten und Hoffen, "passt schon, und wenn nicht, dann Pech" – das ist keine verantwortungsbewusste, mündige Haltung.

Spektrum (inoffiziell)Spezielle lichtempfindliche Moleküle könnten helfen, CO2 aus der Luft zu filtern: Dank ihnen kann eine Lösung das Gas quasi auf Knopfdruck aufnehmen oder abgeben.<a href="https://anonsys.net/search?tag=Treibhausgas" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Treibhausgas</a> <a href="https://anonsys.net/search?tag=CO2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#CO2</a> <a href="https://anonsys.net/search?tag=CO2-Entnahme" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#CO2-Entnahme</a> <a href="https://anonsys.net/search?tag=Directaircapture" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Directaircapture</a> <a href="https://anonsys.net/search?tag=CO2-Entfernung" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#CO2-Entfernung</a> <a href="https://anonsys.net/search?tag=Kohlenstoffdioxid" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Kohlenstoffdioxid</a> <a href="https://anonsys.net/search?tag=Kohlendioxid" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Kohlendioxid</a> <a href="https://anonsys.net/search?tag=Klimawandel" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Klimawandel</a> <a href="https://anonsys.net/search?tag=Climeworks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Climeworks</a> <a href="https://anonsys.net/search?tag=DAC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#DAC</a> <a href="https://anonsys.net/search?tag=Chemie" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Chemie</a> <a href="https://www.spektrum.de/news/fotosaeuren-treibhausgas-entfernung-mit-licht/2205309" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">Treibhausgas-Entfernung mit Licht</a>

anlomedadRegarding the caveat that the most efficient time for <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/CDR" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#CDR</a> is during CO2 phase-out (and not when fossil CO2 has reached zero):the logic is a bit more complicated for the weighing: energy used to replace a fossil source vs energy used to remove a ton from the atmosphere. A ton removed from the atmosphere is 1 full ton. But replacing the fossil source for a ton of emissions isn't 1:1. Half the fossil emissions are taken up by (assumed intact) carbon sinks. So one could argue that <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/Iceland" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Iceland</a>'s renewable energy only needs to replace 50% of the ton that <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/Climeworks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Climeworks</a> removes from the <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/atmosphere" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#atmosphere</a>. Except: this is only true on paper. In reality, Iceland needs to replace the full fossil ton because half a ton added to ocean and biosphere is still a forcing half-ton of CO2. What goes around comes around – eventually. For example in the outgassing spoken of earlier.

anlomedadOh, hang on. I wrote "CDR is most efficient during reduction phase when sinks don't notice it bc then CDR won't lower ppm (but still remove carbon from the atmo)."Yeah. But it has to be a version of <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/CDR" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#CDR</a> that doesn't steal renewable energy capacity from the reduction efforts. Like for instance, <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/Climeworks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Climeworks</a> in Iceland is stealing RE. But at such a remote location that energy export would in itself incur much GHG and energy. I'd assume, RE export from <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/Iceland" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Iceland</a> would only be as <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/hydrogen" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#hydrogen</a> or some other fuel-conversion. H2 loses 70% in production, doesn't it? Does "well -to-wheel" deduct even more or is that already accounted for in the -70%? But that would be the value for H2 as fuel for gas guzzlers which no one in their right mind proposes.H2 is also used in industrial processes directly in the xxxMt per year range. So if Iceland were to export green industrial H2 made with the RE that Climeworks uses – would that make a dent? Or is it better to let CW scale up with stolen RE?

anlomedadThinking of a theoretical CO2 removal calculation to get back down to 350ppm=1°C by year 2100. Theoretical assumptions: sinks stay as intact as today, fossil CO2 since 350ppm will stop at 1600Gt, permafrost and dried, non-rewettable wetlands add 360. 50% of all of this goes into sinks = 980Gt for removal? No. Sinks in the net negative emission phase outgas 50% for every ton removed 💡=1470 Gt CO2 for NET by the year 2100, or 400 Gt Carbon. Where the outgassing occurs is shown in the middle row of maps in picture 3. The huge amount of removal best matches the left panel. Regarding competition with food and biodiversity, I recall from another paper that <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/BECCS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#BECCS</a> can sustainably remove 3Gt CO2 per year. The S for storage (or use) incurs energy needs in transport to storage or use sites. By 2050, <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/Climeworks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Climeworks</a> expects to suck 1Gt CO2 annually out of the atmosphere and stone-ify it in <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/Iceland" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Iceland</a>'s particular <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/geology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#geology</a>.Okay. So how much is my theoretical 1470 annually if I assume a constant removal rate from 2040ff? -24.5 Gt CO2 per year.Thoughts? The screenshots are from Katarzyna B Tokarska and Kirsten Zickfeld 2015, "The effectiveness of net negative carbon dioxide emissions in reversing anthropogenic climate change" <a href="https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094013" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094013</a> <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/CarbonRemoval" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#CarbonRemoval</a> <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/CDR" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#CDR</a> <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/NET" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#NET</a> <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/Climate" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Climate</a> <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/ClimateFeedbacks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ClimateFeedbacks</a>

Arnold Boer<a href="https://mastodon.world/@davidho" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@davidho</a> less than 7 flights from Amsterdam to Sydney. Or, almost nothing. Does anyone know something about net CO2 removal of these factories? <a href="https://mastodon.green/tags/climeworks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#climeworks</a>

anlomedad<a href="https://mastodon.world/@davidho" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@davidho</a> Ah well. The emissions from mining and smashing the rocks in Greenland are occurring so close to <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/ClimeWorks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ClimeWorks</a> that the molecules will surely be quickly vanished into Iceland's rock, and by using all-green energy. 🙃

anlomedad<a href="https://mastodon.world/@MatthiasSchmelzer" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@MatthiasSchmelzer</a> Very good writeup, thank you!I stumbled over 2 things. For my taste, "climate breakdown" is too ... climate-slang in an academic meta review on history and current state of <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/Degrowth" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Degrowth</a> research such as yours. The climate can't break down. What can experience a breakdown are human systems, like supply chains, nation states, or civilisation itself. And their breakdown around inherent breaking points can be caused by the too rapidly changing climate and biosphere. What made you choose the term "climate breakdown"? The second stumble is a mostly overlooked emission factor. You do mention emissions embedded in trade as the elephant in the room. But citizens of 1 country cause emissions which then count towards the climate debt of another country when they travel, too. The book <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/Deutschland2050" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Deutschland2050</a> quotes this NAUTRE paper <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-018-0141-x" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-018-0141-x</a> (€+)pirated: <a href="https://sci-hubtw.hkvisa.net/10.1038/s41558-018-0141-x" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://sci-hubtw.hkvisa.net/10.1038/s41558-018-0141-x</a> which reckons that in 2019, Germans caused 329Mt CO2 abroad. IIRC, it excluded the (aviation) CO2 from transportation TO the destination but included transport CO2 at the destination. That was 40% or almost half the official German 2019 consumption-based emissions. But the 329Mt did not count toward the travelling Germans' climate debt. Instead, the countries where they traveled to now carry the burden of having had to import CO2-laden goods and services to accommodate the traveling Germans in 2019.. 329Mt CO2... Yet no one speaks about CO2 embedded in travel. <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/Climeworks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Climeworks</a> promises they'll be able to store 1Mt per year by 2030, right? So it'd take 329 years just to store away the CO2 debt from the 2019 traveling Germans... Even during the pandemic these traveling and ultimately, massmurdering CO2-idiots did not stop traveling.. Travel miles need to be rationed. And not via price, lest the decadent rich just keep killing us, but just and equal in a per capita allowance with spare miles set aside for state services. Also of course: bearing mind the inequality of mobility and CO2 debt from transportation, one has to realize that not all of the 83 million Germans caused these 329Mt CO2 abroad in 2019 but that only ~ 40mio ever travel at all or that a whopping 30% never even fly at all...

anlomedad<a href="https://mstdn.social/@MBergmann" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@MBergmann</a> Der versuchte Maulkorb ist ja heftig. Und grundsätzlich ist das Abstellen des Plastikhahns Priorität wie beim CO2 oder der überlaufenden Badewanne. Nichtsdestotrotz ist die Entwicklung und Anwendung von Aufwischlappen-eq unvermeidlich geworden für die Zeit nachdem der Hahn zugedreht wurde. Und so machen mir die Stimmen intellektuelles Bauchweh, die Carbon Capture and Storage <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/CCS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#CCS</a> <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/CDR" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#CDR</a> von <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/Climeworks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Climeworks</a> , oder das Projekt <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/OceanCleanup" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OceanCleanup</a> wegen <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/Plastik" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Plastik</a> als überflüssig oder unmachbar kritisieren. Die Kritik ist so komisch realitätsvergessen, komisch, weil von Wissenschaftlern kommend, die doch mehr auf dem Kasten haben. Eine Wohnung, die seit 1950 oder gar seit 1750 niemals saubergemacht wurde, reinigt man halt nicht im Handumdrehen. Das Saubermachen oder das Aufwischen dauert dann halt ne ganze Weile und muss begonnen werden, wenn man in der Wohnung weiterleben muss und keinen <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/PlanetB" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PlanetB</a> hat. Die Weiterentwicklung der Prototypen dauert auch. Da muss man jetzt ordentlich Arbeit und Tests reinstecken, damit es ab 2040 so richtig räumt. <a href="https://mstdn.social/@dlf" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@dlf</a>

anlomedad<a href="https://mastodon.social/@tazgetroete" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@tazgetroete</a> Das mit den 100Mrd / Jahr wurde aber nicht 1992 beschlossen sondern 2015 in Paris. Oder? Und Lindner hatte versprochen, dafür zu sorgen, dass den MAPA die Schulden bei Weltbank und IMF erlassen werden, erinnerte ihn <a href="https://social.rebellion.global/@ScientistRebellion" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@ScientistRebellion</a>, als sie in ihrer Aktionsreihe <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/DebtForClimate" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#DebtForClimate</a> ua. das BMF und den Porsche-Showroom besetzten.Bei <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/Climeworks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Climeworks</a> kann unser BMF kiloweise die Versenkung unseres historischen CO2 im Isländischen Gestein kaufen <a href="https://climeworks.com/one-off-climate-purchase" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://climeworks.com/one-off-climate-purchase</a> Eine Tonne kostet 1000€. Wir haben aber eine Klimaschuld von 96 Milliarden Tonnen angehäuft, und sie wächst immer noch weiter. Jeder von uns jetzt Lebenden profitiert immernoch von diesen historisch entstandenen Klimaschulden. Jeder von uns profitiert also davon, dass in <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/Pakistan" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Pakistan</a> 30 Millionen Menschen ihre Zukunft verloren haben. <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/FDP" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#FDP</a> <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/Lindner" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Lindner</a> erlaubte 40mio € als Soforthilfe = 1 Dose Tomatensuppe für jeden Betroffenen zu schicken! Wobei das Riesenland selbst nur eine Klimaschuld von 5Gt. hat.

Windows Central :verified:Microsoft's investments in Climeworks are officially starting to pay off. <a href="https://www.windowscentral.com/microsoft/microsofts-investments-in-climeworks-are-officially-starting-to-pay-off" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://www.windowscentral.com/microsoft/microsofts-investments-in-climeworks-are-officially-starting-to-pay-off</a> <a href="https://mastodon.cloud/tags/Climeworks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Climeworks</a> <a href="https://mastodon.cloud/tags/Microsoft" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Microsoft</a> $MSFT

anlomedad<a href="https://fediscience.org/@rahmstorf" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@rahmstorf</a> Cooler Zusammenhang, <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/Climeworks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Climeworks</a> und <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/Tempolimit" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Tempolimit</a>. Aber <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/Wissing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Wissing</a> ist nicht der einzige der FDP, der regelrechte Klimasabotage betreibt. <a href="https://bewegung.social/@a_watch" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@a_watch</a> hat grad auch einen Thread über ne Correctiv Recherche, wie <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/Buschmann" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Buschmann</a> im <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/BMJ" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#BMJ</a> und im <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/EURat" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#EURat</a> Klimasabotage betreibt. Stichwort <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/SafeHarbour" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#SafeHarbour</a> <a href="https://bewegung.social/@a_watch/109750382855430472" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://bewegung.social/@a_watch/109750382855430472</a>

NatureLover 🌲Swiss company that counts Microsoft as a customer says it’s removed CO2 from the air and put it in the ground<a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/12/swiss-company-climeworks-has-removed-co2-from-air-put-it-underground.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/12/swiss-company-climeworks-has-removed-co2-from-air-put-it-underground.html</a><a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/co2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#co2</a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/climeworks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#climeworks</a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/cnbc" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#cnbc</a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/Environment" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Environment</a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/GlobalWarming" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GlobalWarming</a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/technology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#technology</a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/CarbonRemoval" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#CarbonRemoval</a>

SanjayClimeworks, a Swiss company that counts Microsoft as a customer says it’s removed CO2 from the air and put it in the ground <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/Environment" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Environment</a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/climeworks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#climeworks</a> <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/12/swiss-company-climeworks-has-removed-co2-from-air-put-it-underground.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/12/swiss-company-climeworks-has-removed-co2-from-air-put-it-underground.html</a>

Mark DunkSwiss company that counts Microsoft as a customer says it’s removed CO2 from the air and put it in the ground by Catherine Clifford Climeworks says it has successfully taken carbon dioxide out of the air and put it in the ground where it will turn into rock in a process that has been verified by third party certifiers — a first.<a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/12/swiss-company-climeworks-has-removed-co2-from-air-put-it-underground.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/12/swiss-company-climeworks-has-removed-co2-from-air-put-it-underground.html</a><a href="https://mastodon.education/tags/climate" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#climate</a> <a href="https://mastodon.education/tags/co2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#co2</a> <a href="https://mastodon.education/tags/microsoft" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#microsoft</a> <a href="https://mastodon.education/tags/climeworks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#climeworks</a> <a href="https://mastodon.education/tags/sequestration" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#sequestration</a> <a href="https://mastodon.education/tags/carbon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#carbon</a>

Recent searches

Search options

Administered by:

Server stats:

#climeworks