toad.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Mastodon server operated by David Troy, a tech pioneer and investigative journalist addressing threats to democracy. Thoughtful participation and discussion welcome.

Administered by:

Server stats:

272
active users

#delusions

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

Pointing the finger

As Joe from Missouri put it: “How do all these [members of] Congress and senators become millionaires when they’re supposed to be working for the people? ‘I’m a public servant.’ Bullshit. You’re an inside trader. You’re getting kickbacks.”

archive.today/2025.04.28-02523

But do they really think Trump is going work for them? No way - Joe’s face will continue to be ground into the shite. Supporting Republicans or Democrats is a loser for him.

America’s commander-in-belief tells The Times about trying to stop the president swearing and why the UK has become ‘like Russia at the height of communism’

What a thankless role! But he doesn’t worry, His hypocrisy will carry him through and allow him to sleep at night.

What bit of the ‘teachings of Jesus’ do these religious types actually believe in and attempt to emulate?

archive.today/2025.04.23-03552 (archive)

Equal time for the other brilliant late-night host, deeply unloved by the #TrumpVirus / #GQP anti- #Truth #cult

> Jimmy Kimmel Live: “CHAT'S OUT OF THE BAG!”

youtu.be/nfKCwWN87jI

> "Team Trump’s Text Chain Disaster Gets Worse, “War Plans” Lies Won’t Stop & Very Dangerous Boom Mics"

It's amazing there are still people who believe that AI models that can't count how many times the letter 'r' appears in the word "strawberry", or that advise people to use glue to keep the cheese on a pizza--despite being trained on a sizable fraction of English-language knowledge--are going to "do science" or "solve physics" or "figure out climate change".

I'm all for challenging received wisdom and assumptions, and I think magical thinking can be quite good if practiced well. But this is something else. To me this feels like the celebration of a dangerous kind of induced ignorance.

#AI #GenAI #GenerativeAI #AIHype #delusions #MagicalThinking

"Trump... telling reporters: “Elon can’t do and won’t do anything without our approval. And we’ll give him the approval where appropriate, where not appropriate, **we** won’t.”

“If there’s a conflict,” he added, “then **we** won’t let him get near it.”"
nytimes.com/2025/02/03/us/poli

Does it disturb anyone else that Trump has started speaking using the 'royal we' to refer to himself?

As if he is King of the USA.

The New York Times · Elon Musk’s Blitz Shakes U.S. Government as He Sweeps Through AgenciesBy Jonathan Swan

Good morning. 🦋🦋🦋

1 February 2025

It's Saturday all over again. It feels like we just had one, as if the world keeps spinning in circles. When I was a child, during the days of John Glenn, I would occasionally dream of being an astronaut. In fact, in my dreams, I was launched into space as the youngest astronaut ever. Why would they do that? Well, because it was me—I was special and a hero in my own mind. I want to note that I've never actually mentioned those dreams to anybody before, so you're the first to know. I only had the hero complex while sleeping, though. There are people today who have delusions of grandeur even when they are awake. You know who they are.

"A delusion is something that people believe in despite a total lack of evidence." - Richard Dawkins

"You cannot reason with delusion." - Rachel Lindsay

#Israel and the #delusions of #Germany’s ‘ #memoryculture

Basically, #antisemitism was replaced by obsequious #philosemitism, which turns out to be just the brighter side of the same coin, and denazification was only very superficial, not just in Germany, but everywhere else it had spawned. Basically, the old world of the #extremeright never died. It just kept lurking from under our beds, ready to jump at the forefront, with the freaking faces of #Musk or #Trump.

theguardian.com/news/2025/jan/

Psychology of Delusions: Why We Cling to False Beliefs

Delusions aren’t just quirky thoughts; they’re deeply held beliefs that defy logic and evidence. They’re like stubborn weeds in the garden of the mind, refusing to budge even when confronted with the most compelling counterarguments. But why do they take root in the first place? Often, it’s because they serve a purpose, acting as a psychological shield against the harsh realities of life. Think of them as a mental coping mechanism, a way to cushion the blow of painful truths or overwhelming anxieties. The DSM-5, the psychiatrist’s bible, defines them as fixed beliefs resistant to change, often arising from complex emotional and cognitive landscapes. They’re not mere whims, but rather a reflection of a deep-seated psychological need.

Perception, delusion, and reality are like three intertwined threads, each distinct yet constantly interacting. Perception is how we take in and make sense of the world around us. Reality, though a slippery concept, is generally understood as the objective truth, independent of our individual biases. Delusions, however, are like tricksters, masquerading as interpretations of reality, especially when our minds need a comforting narrative to shield us from the harsh glare of truth. The key difference? Delusions persist even when confronted with a mountain of evidence to the contrary. You might see a shadow and, quite rationally, assume it’s just that – a shadow. But a delusional mind might interpret that same shadow as an omen of impending doom, even when the light clearly reveals its true nature.

Challenging a delusion head-on is like poking a hornet’s nest. You’re not just questioning a belief; you’re threatening the very foundation upon which a person’s psychological stability rests. Imagine someone convinced their long-lost friend is still sending them letters, despite evidence to the contrary. Presenting them with proof of their friend’s passing might trigger denial, accusations of forgery, or even a complete rejection of the system. It’s a defensive maneuver, a desperate attempt to protect a fragile sense of self. Freud, the father of psychoanalysis, recognized this phenomenon, noting that dismantling illusions can lead to a psychological unraveling. The backlash can be fierce because, in their mind, the person is fighting for their emotional survival.

Yet, there’s hope. With careful and empathetic guidance, it’s possible to gently nudge a person towards a re-evaluation of their delusional framework. Carl Jung, a pioneer of analytical psychology, believed that true insight comes from within, not from external criticism. Allowing individuals to question their own assumptions, at their own pace, can lead to a more lasting and meaningful realization. This is why the adage “Don’t mess with people’s delusions” holds so much weight. Direct confrontation can be like ripping off a Band-Aid too quickly, leaving the wound exposed and more vulnerable than before.

Humanity has a knack for weaving illusions into the fabric of our cultures, politics, and religions. Plato’s Allegory of the Cave paints a vivid picture of this. Prisoners chained in a cave, seeing only shadows projected on a wall, mistake these shadows for reality. When one prisoner escapes and sees the true world, his attempts to enlighten his fellow prisoners are met with disbelief and scorn. This allegory highlights the uncomfortable truth that challenging collective delusions can trigger hostility and resistance.

But here’s the real test of us: can we, or should we, even strive to live entirely without delusions? On the one hand, intellectual honesty demands that we seek the truth, no matter how uncomfortable. On the other hand, some illusions, like a touch of self-deception, can act as a buffer against the anxieties of existence. Nietzsche, the philosopher of the Übermensch, even argued that certain illusions are life-affirming, fueling our creativity and helping us cope with the bleakness of reality.

In a world often perceived as cruel and chaotic, delusions can offer a sense of solace. Some find comfort in rigid belief systems, while others cling to unwavering optimism or an exaggerated sense of control. These illusions act as psychological scaffolding, propping up our emotional well-being. They may not be rooted in logic or morality, but they can become essential tools for self-preservation.

However, we must also acknowledge the darker side of illusions. When they morph into widespread ideologies, they can justify violence and oppression. Collective delusions, or myths, can warp our moral compasses, leading to the exploitation and harm of others. History is littered with examples of this, from totalitarian regimes to colonial conquests, each fueled by distorted narratives that masked injustice.

Can we ever truly escape the clutches of delusion? Human cognition is remarkably adaptable. Through philosophical inquiry, scientific discovery, and introspection, we can challenge and refine our illusions. But complete eradication of self-deception is a rare feat. At best, we cycle through illusions, trading one for another that seems more beneficial or less harmful. Ideally, we replace delusion with knowledge and acceptance, but even our understanding of reality is constantly evolving, shaped by partial truths and inherent biases.

We stand at a crossroads, caught between the need for psychological comfort and the pursuit of moral truth. Delusions can cushion us from life’s blows and even inspire creativity. But left unchecked, they can fester into social and ethical maladies. To truly understand these “warped reality fields,” we must recognize their potential for both harm and creative expression. They can propel us to imaginative heights, fueling art, literature, and innovation, but they can also trap us in denial and destructive behavior.

“Don’t mess with people’s delusions” is both a warning and an invitation to engage thoughtfully. We must respect the emotional function of these beliefs, but we cannot remain silent when they cause harm. The key lies in finding a balance: empathy coupled with a commitment to truth, ethical responsibility, and personal growth. In a world that’s constantly changing and often harsh, a little psychological sedation might seem necessary, but critical thinking and moral vigilance are equally crucial if we hope to build a better collective reality.

Interesting article about psychosis, with an example of postpartum psychosis where a hospital patient for a time recognized strangers as her in-laws.

The article and study dwell on the psychological aspect of the delusions. But I can't help but to wonder if there is also a biochemical component to the problem. A chemical imbalance if you will.

#science #psychology #delusions

What delusions can tell us about the cognitive nature of belief
theconversation.com/what-delus

The ConversationWhat delusions can tell us about the cognitive nature of beliefThe creation of delusions may involve a fair bit of rational thinking.

Sunday Morning Reading

If it’s Sunday, it is time for Sunday Morning Reading with interesting writing on a variety of topics, that without intending to all seem to involve delusions in one way or another. There’s also a little Procol Harum on the side. Enjoy reading, while you skip the light fandango.

Speaking of delusions, check out a piece by Michael Connors and Peter Halligan exploring What Delusions Can Tell Us About the Cognitive Nature of Belief. 

It’s no delusion that Artificial Intelligence remains in the news (before it eventually subsumes the news). Harry McCracken takes us a bit into the deep mind behind Google’s DeepMind in The Future According to Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis. That first link takes you to the web version, this one takes you to the Apple News version of the article since the piece is a premium article for Fast Company readers.

Joan Westenberg has caught my eye of late (if you follow Sunday Morning Reading you should know that) and here are a couple of recently published dynamic pieces: Don’t Confuse Volume with Truth and Rebel Optimism: How We Thrive in a Broken World. Both worth your time.

We’re all complaining about a lot of things, the continued enshittification of the Internet being a familiar and well deserved  target. (It’s interesting that I use that term enshittification so frequently and yet spell check or any other type of check hasn’t picked it up yet.) Dave Winer is fighting the good fight on a lot of fronts and he looks at a new kind of enshittification in Billionaire-proof?

David Todd McCarty takes on the platitude “the meek shall inherit the earth” in The Children of Pacifists.

Ronan Farrow takes a look at The Technology The Trump Administration Could Use To Hack Your Phone. You know it’s going to happen. You know it most likely already has.

And to round things out this week, Ulf Wolf spools out an essay on the mostly forgotten Keith Reid of Procol Harum in The Shadow Member of Procol Harum. Not going to lie, I did spin up a copy of Whiter Shade of Pale while writing this week’s column. The Salty Dog album is cued up next.

If you’re interested in just what the heck Sunday Morning Reading is all about you can read more about the origins of Sunday Morning Reading here.  You can also find more of my writings on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome. You can also find me on social networks, including Bluesky, under my own name.

Ars Technica · What delusions can tell us about the cognitive nature of beliefBy The Conversation
Continued thread

#Trump’s *persecution defense*, the notion that he gets in so much trouble only because everyone is out to get him [#paranoid #delusions], resonates at his rallies where he says “they’re not coming after me, they’re coming after you, & I’m just standing in the way.” But that of course belies a record of #scandal stretching across his 78yrs starting long before #politics.

#rape #misogyny #fraud #racism #WhiteSupremacy #MaleSupremacy #RulingClass #law #democracy #criminal #law
#HarrisWalz2024