Wm.son<p><a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/NOTUS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>NOTUS</span></a> <a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/NOTUSNewsLetter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>NOTUSNewsLetter</span></a> <a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/SignalScandal" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SignalScandal</span></a> <a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/GOPAccountability" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GOPAccountability</span></a></p><p><a href="https://www.notus.org/defense/republican-senators-signal-group-chat-investigation" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">notus.org/defense/republican-s</span><span class="invisible">enators-signal-group-chat-investigation</span></a></p><p>"We’ve noticed a divide with how they’ve been reacting to this possible security breach.<br> Those most closely aligned with the White House messaging — that this was a one-off “nothing-burger,” as Sen. Markwayne Mullin put it — are focused on how Goldberg accidentally got added to the chat. </p><p>Those more open to an investigation, however, have a much larger concern about the Signal of it all. </p><p>“The question is, if it was classified information, why were you not using a classified conduit to send it?” Sen. Thom Tillis said.</p><p>At least one Republican already had his answer. “To me, the bottom line is: Is Signal secure enough to discuss the type of detailed information that we all know was discussed? And I think the answer to that for me is, no,” Sen. Kevin Cramer said.</p>