toad.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Mastodon server operated by David Troy, a tech pioneer and investigative journalist addressing threats to democracy. Thoughtful participation and discussion welcome.

Administered by:

Server stats:

310
active users

#notwithstandingclause

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

I think that debate about using the #NotwithstandingClause to overturn R. v. Bissonnette (thereby permitting longer time without parole) is a winning one for Conservatives.

When the debate is an abstract one about Charter rights and judicial vs. parliamentary supremacy, opponents of the #NotwithstandingClause have reasonable arguments to make. But then the proponents will bring up specific crimes and voters will want stiffer penalties.

For instance...

1/2

#crime #CPC
#CanPol #cdnpoli #elxn45

@HarriettMB
Exactly this. Folks need to understand what’s happening in the US is part of a global strategy to undermine democratic rule. The application of this strategy varies depending on the country in question, but basically the gameplan is to exploit ‘weaknesses’ in each countries legal code in order to chip away at the democratic order and install fascism. In Canada, that exploit is the #NotwithstandingClause.

While #Trump is illegally ignoring Supreme Court decisions in order to advance his #fascist agenda, #PierrePoilievre, as Prime Minister, would seek to use, for the first time ever by the federal government, the Canadian Constitution's #NotwithstandingClause in order to end what he calls "#WokeCulture" in the #PublicService and in the #military.

But he denies being a "mini-Trump"

#NeverPoilievre #LGBTQrights #AbortionRights #HumanRights #NeverVoteConservative
#Never51

Replied in thread

@Poli_Tics
Dougie made the list too. Ford’s move shows how the #NotwithstandingClause can (and has) been used to strip away other right (besides those of minority communities), like worker’s rights.

They intend to use this as a blanket ‘get out of jail free’ card. And if we elect a federal Conservative government, there will be no one left to stand up for the rights of Canadians.

Replied in thread

@Poli_Tics
Using it this way would be a test-case; relatively easy to push through because everyone hates murderers, right?

Nobody should kid themselves that it wouldn’t be used again and again whenever the Conservatives want to pass some law that infringes on Canadian’s constitutional rights. It’s already happening in the provinces.

#NotwithstandingClause.

Continued thread

For clarity, the global fascist’s playbook involves twisting a country’s rules and manipulating its institutions in order to consolidate power and overcome impediments to unilateral rule. In #Canada the biggest weakness encoded in our constitution is the #NotwithstandingClause, which enables provincial governments to ‘opt out’ of federal legislation if they feel it encroaches on provincial sovereignty, and we’ve seen multiple instance of provincial Conservative governments invoking the NWC in order to ram through their agendas. Recently now, we’re even seeing PM Conservative hopeful Pierre #Poillievre alluding to invoking the NWC federally in order to pass likely-unconstitutional ‘tough on crime’ legislation.

The global rise of fascism is a coordinated effort to undermine democracies worldwide to the benefit of the multinational oligarchs.

Replied in thread

@camerondotca
Personally, I think the Québec sign law is a reasonable compromise, even if it infringes on freedom of expression. Legislatures are generally better at hammering out compromises than courts.

On the other hand, there are cases in which the #NotwithstandingClause has been used foolishly, e.g., to deny jobs to teachers who choose to wear headscarves.

And personally I want the clause to be used to overrule the decision on sentencing in R. v. Bissonnette.

Replied in thread

@camerondotca
Before the Charter, Canada had a constitutional system of parliamentary supremacy. By bringing in the Charter, we gave judges the power to override democracy in the name of specified rights. That inevitably leads to differences in interpretation [0], and so we adopted the #NotwithstandingClause to give parliament the final word.

[0] Even the Supreme Court of today sometimes finds that the Supreme Court of 1990 was mistaken.

When Merv Leitch and Peter Lougheed created the notwithstanding clause, they couldn't have imagined a Canada where premiers could invoke the clause without political or moral hazard. The Senate is now debating a provocative proposition. Should we vow, preemptively, to refuse to pass any law that preemptively deploys the clause? Here's my take - which starts with a little history lesson. youtu.be/IEnAWFmLdjE?si=8pSfng #SenateofCanada #NotwithstandingClause #cdnpoli #Alberta #abpoli #Vriend

If you are a mayor of an Ontario municipality, and the ONLY WAY you can see to governing that municipality is by asking the premier to take away the basic Human Rights of your poorest constituents, then you are a shit mayor who should resign in total shame.

Like the mayors of THESE cities:

Barrie
Brampton
Pickering
Brantford
Chatem-Kent
Clarington
Oakville
Oshawa
Sudbury
Windsor
Pickering
St Catherines
Cambridge

#ontario #onpoli #notwithstandingclause

cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ont

CBCOntario mayors ask Ford to use notwithstanding clause to clear homeless encampments | CBC NewsThirteen Ontario city mayors are asking Premier Doug Ford to use the notwithstanding clause to override a court decision preventing municipalities from clearing homeless encampments if their shelters are full.