SnoopJ<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@glyph" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>glyph</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://hachyderm.io/@mitsuhiko" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>mitsuhiko</span></a></span> I can tell you that in <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/python" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>python</span></a> on Libera.chat, we have had very mixed results. AFAIK, not one of those users has become a continuing part of that community, but the things that lead most reliably to these users getting the help that they want are:</p><p>1) Avoid criticism of the chatbots. No room for persuasion generally, and flamewar is likely.</p><p>2) Much more patience is required. Choose your questions carefully, "too many" questions will lead to withdrawal. The extreme case is a user who is consulting the chatbot and the community simultaneously.</p><p>It's impossible to draw general inferences from an environment as pathological as IRC, but I would say these two points apply equally well to interpersonal interactions I have had in the local user group.</p><p>The overall impression I am left with is that the tools themselves disincentivize participation in a community, and incentivize talking to other humans only for swapping tips about tools, or as a way to get someone to "just" produce source code that fixes the tool's errors.</p>