sneumann<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mstdn.social/@wobweger" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>wobweger</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://openbiblio.social/@steffi_ge" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>steffi_ge</span></a></span> Hi, that's pretty cool! <br>I still see that journals ask for your <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/ResearchSoftware" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ResearchSoftware</span></a> to be deposited in a generic repository with a DOI. Ugh. I can understand that this ensures long term archival, which might not be guaranteed on the git*.com where people can even nuke their repository. <br>How can we convince journals that citing <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/SHWID" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SHWID</span></a> is superior to citing ZIP dumps with DOIs ?</p>