toad.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Mastodon server operated by David Troy, a tech pioneer and investigative journalist addressing threats to democracy. Thoughtful participation and discussion welcome.

Administered by:

Server stats:

274
active users

#scolcomm

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
eLife<p>💬 “It felt more like a collaboration than an exam.”</p><p>Victor, Alexandra &amp; Katerina share what it was like publishing their work through eLife’s PRC model, and how it helped them focus on what was possible rather than what was out of reach. <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/AcademicChatter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AcademicChatter</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenScience</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScolComm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScolComm</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SciencePublishing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SciencePublishing</span></a><br><a href="https://elifesciences.org/inside-elife/eba5f10f/publishing-with-elife-more-a-process-of-a-collaboration-than-an-exam-you-need-to-pass?utm_source=mastodon&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_campaign=organic" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">elifesciences.org/inside-elife</span><span class="invisible">/eba5f10f/publishing-with-elife-more-a-process-of-a-collaboration-than-an-exam-you-need-to-pass?utm_source=mastodon&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_campaign=organic</span></a></p>
petersuber<p>New study: "Many academics in the discipline of <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/English" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>English</span></a> working at <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Australian" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Australian</span></a> universities are expected to comply with institutional policies…which use various journal <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/rankings" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>rankings</span></a> as a proxy for <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/quality" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>quality</span></a>. This is in spite of the fact that extensive research demonstrates that such rankings are problematic when used to evaluate individual researchers, particularly in the <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/humanities" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>humanities</span></a>."<br><a href="https://australianhumanitiesreview.org/2024/06/30/the-impact-of-journal-ranking-systems-on-the-discipline-of-english-in-australia/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">australianhumanitiesreview.org</span><span class="invisible">/2024/06/30/the-impact-of-journal-ranking-systems-on-the-discipline-of-english-in-australia/</span></a> </p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Academia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Academia</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Assessment" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Assessment</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Australia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Australia</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScolComm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScolComm</span></a><br><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/academicchatter" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>academicchatter</span></a></span></p>