toad.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Mastodon server operated by David Troy, a tech pioneer and investigative journalist addressing threats to democracy. Thoughtful participation and discussion welcome.

Administered by:

Server stats:

359
active users

#writers

103 posts62 participants9 posts today

#WritersCoffeeClub #WCC 2504.18 — Do you write under a pen name? Multiple? How did you choose?

My mum did not name me RS.

Names are symbols that point to a thing or a person. They aren't that person. Sure, I can input an identity into a name, just as a given name can gather that weight during life, but it is still a symbol. I've made peace with myself that whatever achievement or infamy I gather under this name still applies to me. The idea is fascinating enough that I'm playing with the idea of a society where parents don't name their children, instead the children are forced to choose, and can change them at whim throughout life.

I assumed my nom de plume before I attended the Clarion Writers Workshop. Mostly, this was me once more playing with the idea that as a feminist writer, the gender of the author does add subtext to all narratives.

Growing up, I thought Andre Norton was a man; it added a definite context to all his stories, like The Beastmaster, A Breed to Come, and Moon of Three Rings. I liked the nuanced way that the author depicted masculinity and femininity. The softness set the author's books apart, and it appealed to me. But Andre Norton wasn't male; I learned that quite sometime later.

Choosing a name of the opposite gender didn't work for me anymore. I could have chosen a name used by both genders, like Ryan or Riley, but when you think about it, that puts the onus on the readership to assign gender based on their experience with people of the same name. Either way, it creates creates a bias. Before I started the workshop, we were given an email group address. Back then, as now, I was careful never to reveal my gender nor my preferences. By the time I arrived in person on campus, most had guessed wrong.

These days, there are further reasons for noms de plume, especially since I write fiction that boosts women's rights, their right to sexuality without shame, gender preferences, and gender agnosticism. Further, I tend to add subtexts to my stories that question both secular and religious authority; in today's "climate," doing so can be… worrisome.

Best I don't use my real name.

PS: I write fan fiction under a different nom de plume.

[Author retains copyright (c)2025 R.S.]

#BoostingIsSharing

#gender #fiction #writer #author
#writing #writingcommunity #writersOfMastodon #writers
#RSdiscussion

#WordWeavers 2504.17 — Is your antagonist high maintenance? CW: Ugly potentially terrifying character description.

Today, not the usual suspect but a total cad.

Ezekiel Stan, one of the original scientist-colonists on Mars—one of the EM Mars Corp's colonial onsite directors until he butts heads with May Ri (the MC)—is a Decath religious macho jackass in plenty of unsavory ways. Depending on how you interact with him, he's super high maintenance, especially if you are a woman. It's hard to satisfy him; his wife knows about and must tolerate all his hypocritical indiscretions as we learn near the end of the book. For men, it might be worse. He has an eye for mistakes or venalities, and never forgets if he can use weaknesses to coerce and corrupt. He's not above violence, even against his own son who turns out "too feminine." If you must interact with him, especially if you live within his sphere of influence, you will do whatever it takes to placate him.

Except for May Ri. That makes Ezekiel and her mutual antagonists. She, however, is not the stupid woman he expects her to be—she's an engineer.

[Author retains copyright (c)2025 R.S.]

#BoostingIsSharing

#gender #fiction #writer #author
#writing #writingcommunity #writersOfMastodon #writers
#RSdiscussion

#WritersCoffeeClub #WCC 2504.17 — Do your real-world tastes show up in your writing?

[Well, you asked. If that's not enough of a content warning, read on.—RS]

I like people.

I may be cripplingly shy, strictly monogamous, and a bit autistic, but I like people. I observe them. From afar. I populate my stories with people that would interest me, who might attract me, whom I would interact with physically could I convince myself because I understand how safe they are or are not. They are the totally average, the generally honest, the sometimes ethically challenged, the occasionally passionate, and the intermittently ambiguous. These are my tastes. Why would I write about other's tastes? However, I work when writing to never fully describe the people who populate my stories so that the reader might satisfy their tastes, too. Notwithstanding red hair and freckles, of course—they look super cute on men as well as women. (Wait… Did RS really say that? Or is RS being funny?)

As for food: What I describe, sometimes in great detail, is my taste. Whether my stomach would rebel eating such a meal is another story altogether. Kippers and onions are salty oily heaven, btw.

I love impressionism. Art sometimes populates my stories, and it is always impressionist. When the character is a photographer, they are an extension of my soul.

[Author retains copyright (c)2025 R.S.]

#BoostingIsSharing

#gender #fiction #writer #author
#writing #writingcommunity #writersOfMastodon #writers
#RSdiscussion

Continued thread

#PennedPossibilities 645, What was the most unexpected challenge you encountered while writing your WIP?

Fucking chaptering. Figuring out what length they should be, how many scenes they should have, how consistent the length ought to be. Gah. I hate it all. I'm tempted to just ditch them and write the whole novel in scenes with maybe major breaks for the first, second, third "acts."