toad.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Mastodon server operated by David Troy, a tech pioneer and investigative journalist addressing threats to democracy. Thoughtful participation and discussion welcome.

Administered by:

Server stats:

336
active users

#debirdify

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Replied in thread

@nomatic @FediFinder I don't see how that violates GDPR. I can maybe see an anti-trust angle, but I don't really know anything about law.

Personally I'd be surprised if there were a law that mandates free (or cheap) API access for third parties.

Banning #Movetodon and #Debirdify without explanation and without responding to inquiries was an unfair move from Twitter for sure (although probably not illegal), but since Twitter has been announcing that they would shut down all API access for everyone anyway I think it would be hard to pursue that angle anyway.

@dennishorn @gavinkarlmeier Hab gerade eine eurer aktuelleren „Haken dran“-Folgen gehört wo es auch um den API-Zugang bei Twitter ging.

Ich habe das Tool #Debirdify entwickelt und da wurde der API-Zugang vor einem Monate "suspended", angeblich wegen eines Regelverstoßes und ich hätte deshalb eine E-Mail bekommen.

Nur: Ich habe keine E-Mail bekommen und trotz mehrmaliger Nachfrage hat der Twitter-Support nicht reagiert.

Replied to Luca Hammer

@luca 10k GET sounds like absurdly few, especially for $100/month. That's 300 a day.

For something like #Debirdify that would mean something like 100 users a day. Maximum I ever saw was 20k users a day. So even for a tiny experiment like Debirdify this would be much, much too little.

Am I missing something or is it really that bad an offer?

Continued thread

#Fedifinder still works to find your remaining followings from #Twitter in the #fediverse: fedifinder.glitch.me/

It didn't at first when I tested it today, but after seeing that the old version (fedifinder-v1.glitch.me/) works, I gave it another try and it went through. Down to 538 from 617 accounts. Will have to look into what happened with the rest (deleted?).

#Debirdify sadly got suspended by Twitter last week.

#twitodon is still functional as well: twitodon.com/

#Debirdify è stato sospeso da Twitter senza preavviso o spiegazione. A quanto pare avrebbe violato "le regole e le politiche di Twitter".

Si sapeva che sarebbe potuto accadere; è successo ad altri servizi in passato, quindi non c'è da esser particolarmente sorpresi o tristi.

Nel frattempo Fedifinder funziona ancora:

:fediverso: fedifinder.social.

Usatelo per trovare i vostri amici di twitter su mastodon e sul fediverso finché siete in tempo!

fedifinder.glitch.meFedifinderFediverse accounts of your X/Twitter followings

#Debirdify has been suspended by Twitter without warning or explanation. Apparently it violated ‘Twitter rules and policies’, but that is all they told us.

We contacted Twitter support about the situation, but we are not particularly optimistic.

We always knew this could happen; it happened to other services in the past, so we are neither particularly surprised nor sad about it.

In the mean time, Fedifinder still works: fedifinder.social

Use it while you still can!

fedifinder.glitch.meFedifinderFediverse accounts of your X/Twitter followings

For a while now, I've been thinking about why some media accounts on #Mastodon grow rapidly and some don't really. The majority of them are filled automatically, so where's the decisive difference?
It looks like I haven't seen the forest for the trees: By far the most helpful thing seems to be a linking to the account on Mastodon on the Twitter profile. So
#Fedifinder and #Debirdify etc. can and as it seems very often do find it. At least until Twitter makes that impossible.

Linking to Mastodon on the own homepage on the other hand doesn't seem to do much.

My small sample suggests that media that link to their Mastodon account on Twitter did accumulate at least 6% of their follower-count, sometimes significantly more than 10%. Without this link, I found a maximum of under 4%.

But there are two notable exceptions.
@heiseonline@social.heise.de until today did not publicize its Mastodon-handle on Twitter, but has reached 17%, whereas the austrian @derStandard@derstandard.at has the link (and its own instance), but stands at less than 1%.

I think
@heiseonline@social.heise.de is growing because of the target audience and the fact, that we're from Germany (where #Mastodon is from) – apart from our content of course. I would hope, that our engagement helped too. But I have no explanation for the case of Der Standard. Maybe someone has an idea. And I certainly would like to see other examples.

Here are the numbers (left Mastodon-Followers, right the ones on Twitter):

Link on Twitter and Homepage:
@themarkup@mastodon.themarkup.org 11k vs. 51k (21%)
@TexasObserver@texasobserver.social 11k vs. 74k (14%)
@tazgetroete@mastodon.social 44k vs. 700k (6%)

Link on Twitter, but not on Homepage:
@ProPublica@newsie.social 64k vs. 912k (7%)
@derStandard@derstandard.at 3k vs. 370k (0,8)

No Link on Twitter, but on the Homepage
@Techmeme@techhub.social 6.5k vs. 430k (1,5%)

No Link on Twitter or Homepage:
@heiseonline@social.heise.de 44k vs. 246k (17%)
@STAT@newsie.social 6k vs. 166k (3,6%)
@swr3@mastodon.social 1.5k vs. 146k (1%)

#TwitterMigration

CC
@spencerdailey@journa.host
@mmasnick@mastodon.social