toad.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Mastodon server operated by David Troy, a tech pioneer and investigative journalist addressing threats to democracy. Thoughtful participation and discussion welcome.

Administered by:

Server stats:

273
active users

#decomputing

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

Upcoming seminar by @danmcquillan:

"Drawing on Illich's 'Tools for Conviviality', this talk will argue that an important role for the contemporary university is to resist AI. The university as a space for the pursuit of knowledge and the development of independent thought has long been undermined by neoliberal restructuring and the ambitions of the Ed Tech industry. So-called generative AI has added computational shock and awe to the assault on criticality, both inside and outside higher education, despite the gulf between the rhetoric and the actual capacities of its computational operations. Such is the synergy between AI's dissimulations and emerging political currents that AI will become embedded in all aspects of students' lives at university and afterwards, preempting and foreclosing diverse futures. It's vital to develop alternatives to AI's optimised nihilism and to sustain the joyful knowledge that nothing is inevitable and other worlds are still possible. The talk will ask what Illich has to teach us about an approach to technology that prioritises creativity and autonomy, how we can bolster academic inquiry through technical inquiry, workers' inquiry and struggle inquiry, and whether the future of higher education should enrol lecturers and students in a process of collective decomputing."

danmcquillan.org/cpct_abstract

danmcquillan.orgAbstract for seminar at the Centre for Philosophy and Critical Thought (CPCT)
Replied in thread

@osfa_2030 @tunubesecamirio @motorhueso @ana_valdi @manje #decomputing no es un problema solo tecnológico, sino sociotécnico. Así que vale la pena refrescar una de las referencias como Geels and co. :)

Es decir, no es un problema de reducir (¿a quién se le va a pedir reducir y cómo se puede conseguir eso? También interesante tener en cuenta teoría de juegos e incentivos económico-culturales y psicológicos). Es contraintuitivo: para que se consiga la reducción como meta antes hay que modificar..

Discusión de la idea de "decomputing". Queridxs amigxs: Dan McQuillan viene proponiendo la idea de "decomputing" --- descomputacion --- como alternativa al "hype" o "con" de la IA. Mañana da una charla en Edimburgo que se puede ver en zoom. Decomputing tiene que ver, pienso, con decrecimiento. A la vez no parece que sea una propuesta primitivista de eliminar completamente la computación.
¿Podríamos intercambiar algunas ideas sobre el tema...?!
Dada la dependencia de nuestra cultura y economía respecto de la computación, supongo que sería una cuestión de equilibrio: habría que reducir, pero en qué grado es para mí toda una incógnita...
En realidad, las opiniones sobre cuánto y en qué sectores habría que decrecer son muy variables, y la mayoría de las veces bastante abstractas... Otras, como el libro de Almazán y González Reyes, pintan un panorama desolador, prácticamente de vuelta a la tracción animal y el casi abandono de las máquinas...
Supongo que el tema de las emisiones y los acuerdos de París son una de las referencias...
Cosas que se me ocurren...
#decomputing
@tunubesecamirio @motorhueso @ana_valdi @manje

→ Public policymaking: from AI to #decomputing
jrf.org.uk/ai-for-public-good/

“[…] #AI in #policymaking would make it more precarious and increase outsourcing and privatisation under the cover of over-hyped technology. [It's] a form of ‘shock doctrine’, where the sense of urgency generated by an allegedly world-transforming technology is used as an opportunity for corporate capture and to transform social systems in frankly authoritarian directions without reflection or democratic debate”

Joseph Rowntree FoundationPublic policymaking: from AI to decomputingAI seems to offer many benefits to public policymaking, but it can't address the tricky structural issues that impede actual change.