ChipMcDonald<p>I'm just going to throw this out there...</p><p> I see that Michael Osterholm has suddenly decided to take a <a href="https://lor.sh/tags/GreatBarringtonDeclaration" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GreatBarringtonDeclaration</span></a> <a href="https://lor.sh/tags/GBD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GBD</span></a> position of <a href="https://lor.sh/tags/letitrip" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>letitrip</span></a> <a href="https://lor.sh/tags/covid" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>covid</span></a> is mild. </p><p> He's actually suggesting it's "a cold" and looks forward to when everybody gets it twice a year, because it's so mild.</p><p> Which is insane. I'd suggest it's also a tell for sociopathy.</p><p> Because he knows <a href="https://lor.sh/tags/longcovid" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>longcovid</span></a> is real, that there isn't a "mild" infection when it's wrecking your immune system, damaging organs.</p><p> Which leads to another point.</p><p> I just remembered, long ago in my more "conspiracy" minded days, I went on a tear reading obscure news, science articles from the 1920s-30s, pre WWII. </p><p> I initially was interested in seeing for myself the extent of the relationship to the Nazis of the Bush family, but it led me on a tangent into eugenics.</p><p> I'm going to make the unsubstantiated claim that:</p><p>1) eugenics was an open, and popular topic among science circles at this time and</p><p>2) much of the public face of eugenics has been expunged.</p><p> Combined with my "funny" theory that <a href="https://lor.sh/tags/sociopaths" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>sociopaths</span></a> make up a much larger portion of the population than we're led to believe, I'm going to suggest that "let it rip" , <a href="https://lor.sh/tags/GBD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GBD</span></a>, and other blatant positions that ignore the impact of <a href="https://lor.sh/tags/covid" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>covid</span></a> on the <a href="https://lor.sh/tags/Poors" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Poors</span></a>, <a href="https://lor.sh/tags/elderly" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>elderly</span></a>, <a href="https://lor.sh/tags/comorbid" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>comorbid</span></a> are in fact - </p><p> a sociopath group-mind think regarding the "pragmatic" advantages to an era of "natural eugenics". </p><p> If this were 1928, I believe the tone these scientists take would be more blatant, and telling. There is no reason not to think that the same attitude among the sociopaths/NPD population isn't occurring now - except they have to be more surreptitious about it.</p><p> *These scenarios, these positions, are not "accidents", or "ignorance"*. </p><p> When an epidemiologist ignores the health implications of a pandemic, he knows exactly what he's saying. As does a virologist that insist that people don't need to wear a mask, etc. etc.</p><p> They're voluntarily participating in <a href="https://lor.sh/tags/eugenics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>eugenics</span></a> lite. To their perspective it's simply logical: only the infirm will be eliminated, and it's harmful to the economy to try to rectify that - and eventually the breed will be stronger. </p><p> I wish I didn't think this; but you've got to consider the cognitive dissonance you experience when this cadre of covid <a href="https://lor.sh/tags/minimizers" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>minimizers</span></a> says things that are contradictory to what they've previously said. </p><p> The sociopath *does not care*. The Narcissist *does not care* if you find them to be lying. It makes no difference to them. That doesn't mean they're not *reasoning*; but reason without empathy and humane consideration leads to eugenics. </p><p> I hope I'm being hyperbolic in my jadedness. But I think we need to be more jaded in this respect, and that these people need to be regarded as neo <a href="https://lor.sh/tags/eugenicists" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>eugenicists</span></a>. </p><p>/ Frakking frak, I'm just a guitar teacher that wants to get back to just having my head in the clouds about music and art. This is stifling. Maybe I'm being too negative....?</p><p>// $.10</p>