toad.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Mastodon server operated by David Troy, a tech pioneer and investigative journalist addressing threats to democracy. Thoughtful participation and discussion welcome.

Administered by:

Server stats:

259
active users

#srm

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Paul Wermer, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.energy/@Sustainable2050" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>Sustainable2050</span></a></span> <br>And this issue was first looked at 20 years ago or more. Researchers were looking at how shell forming marine life was impacted by the increased acidity accompanying the increased CO2 concentration.</p><p>And for some reason the people pushing <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/SolarRadiationModofication" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SolarRadiationModofication</span></a> (<a href="https://sfba.social/tags/SRM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SRM</span></a>) keep forgetting that increased biosphere CO2 has adverse impacts beyond warming. The impacts on ecosystems cannot be ignored.</p><p><a href="https://sfba.social/tags/ClimateCrisis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ClimateCrisis</span></a> is complex and technical wizardry will not solve it</p>
Wendy Siegelman<p>SRM Completes $100,000,000 TRON Treasury Launch</p><p>SRM Entertainment, Inc. the largest publicly traded holder of TRON (TRX) tokens in the world, announced the successful staking of its treasury holdings of 365,096,845 TRON tokens through JustLend. </p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/SRM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SRM</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/TRON" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>TRON</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/JustinSun" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>JustinSun</span></a> </p><p><a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1956744/000164117225017055/ex99-1.htm" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/19</span><span class="invisible">56744/000164117225017055/ex99-1.htm</span></a></p>
Ivi Choc<p><a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/FYI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FYI</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/HerbSimmens" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>HerbSimmens</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/ClimateEmergencyForum" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ClimateEmergencyForum</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/PaulBeckwith" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PaulBeckwith</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/PeterCarter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PeterCarter</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/PeterWadhams" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PeterWadhams</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/GraemeTaylor" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GraemeTaylor</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/SRM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SRM</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/SolarRadiationManagement" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SolarRadiationManagement</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/SolarGeoengineering" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SolarGeoengineering</span></a></p><p>"Dr. Taylor [...] emphasizing that without immediate cooling interventions [...] there is no realistic path to stabilizing the climate...."</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28r8R93EGo8" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="">youtube.com/watch?v=28r8R93EGo8</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/climate" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>climate</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/ClimateScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ClimateScience</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/climatechange" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>climatechange</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/ClimateEmergency" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ClimateEmergency</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/ClimateCrisis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ClimateCrisis</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/ClimateBreakdown" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ClimateBreakdown</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/climatecatastrophe" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>climatecatastrophe</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/globalWarming" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>globalWarming</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/globalHeating" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>globalHeating</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/ExtremeWeather" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ExtremeWeather</span></a></p>
nemo™ 🇺🇦<p>🌞 Solares Geoengineering: Forschende, NGOs &amp; Entscheidungsträger:innen diskutieren in Kapstadt über SRM – Sonnenstrahlen ins All reflektieren, um die Erderwärmung zu bremsen. Umstritten, aber immer aktueller! Mehr dazu im Artikel: <a href="https://www.srf.ch/news/dialog/kampf-gegen-klimaerwaermung-solares-geoengineering-mit-sonnenstrahlen-gegen-den-klimawandel" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">srf.ch/news/dialog/kampf-gegen</span><span class="invisible">-klimaerwaermung-solares-geoengineering-mit-sonnenstrahlen-gegen-den-klimawandel</span></a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Klimawandel" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Klimawandel</span></a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Geoengineering" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Geoengineering</span></a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/SRM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SRM</span></a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/KlimaDebatte" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>KlimaDebatte</span></a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/newz" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>newz</span></a></p>
Umweltbundesamt<p>Einen anschaulichen Überblick über <a href="https://social.bund.de/tags/SRM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SRM</span></a> und andere Methoden des <a href="https://social.bund.de/tags/Geoengineering" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Geoengineering</span></a> sowie die neuesten UBA-Publikationen, Poster und Grafiken gibt es auf der UBA-Themenseite: <a href="https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/themen/klima-energie/internationale-klimapolitik/geoengineering" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">umweltbundesamt.de/themen/klim</span><span class="invisible">a-energie/internationale-klimapolitik/geoengineering</span></a></p>
ClimateBook<p><a class="hashtag" href="https://bsky.app/search?q=%23geoengineering" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#geoengineering</a> <a class="hashtag" href="https://bsky.app/search?q=%23SRM" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#SRM</a> An alarming development: The Israili startup Stardust is aimed at developing and patenting solar geoengineering technology and selling it for profit. The worst of all possible worlds -- aimed at developing deployable tech for profit: <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/a-mysterious-startup-is-developing-a-new-form-of-solar-geoengineering/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">www.wired.com/story/a-myst...</a><br><br><a href="https://www.wired.com/story/a-mysterious-startup-is-developing-a-new-form-of-solar-geoengineering/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">A Mysterious Startup Is Develo...</a></p>
anlomedad<p>The Cli-Fi youth novel " °C Celsius " by <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/MarcElsberg" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MarcElsberg</span></a> <a href="https://www.lovelybooks.de/autor/Marc-Elsberg/-C-Celsius-7259470664-w/leserunde/8486314240/8921172467/#thread" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">lovelybooks.de/autor/Marc-Elsb</span><span class="invisible">erg/-C-Celsius-7259470664-w/leserunde/8486314240/8921172467/#thread</span></a><br>weaves together a few SRM scenarios into a plot. One scenario goes like this: a few poor-ish tropical countries gang up and start SRM, while also sabotaging all means to counter their project. <br>The reasoning they give to the world is an analysis how only cold-ish countries managed to industrialise early on and still benefit from their fast development. <br>So logically, it should be expected that these tropical countries would make a similar evolution if only the mean temperature goes down to 21 °C or so, 8 degrees celsius cooler than today. </p><p>And off they go, blasting SO2 into the stratosphere according to their target. </p><p>^^</p><p>And no one can stop them. </p><p>Elsberg omits describing the potential mid- to long-term fallout in detail on ecosystems, economies. But he mentions a few short-term impacts like torrential rains from the now-colder atmosphere releasing the moisture it can no longer hold. </p><p>Reading the reasoning did sound justified at that moment, -8°C sounds shockingly justified. 😱 </p><p>But now, while looking at Australia's and Brasil's weather stations for a new project of mine, it occurs to me that Australia is just outside Brasil's latitudes, and Australia is rich, Brasil is not. Brasil is of course member of Elsberg's tropical <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/SRM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SRM</span></a> gang, Australia not. <br>Annual mean °C is <br>25.5 for Brazil<br>22.5 for Australia. </p><p>Following the scenario logic, it should have sufficed to aim for 3°C cooling in order to get to Australia's level. -4°C at the outside. <br>And to get colonised by Great Britain of course, in order to also migrate the societal order to the same system that worked so well for British colonies until the 1950s or so. ^^ </p><p><a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/CliFi" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>CliFi</span></a></p>
Tomi<p>**<b>Setting up a Synology router and wifi mesh – was it a mistake?</b>**</p><p>Read it <a href="https://blog.rozman.info/setting-up-a-synology-router-and-wifi-mesh-was-it-a-mistake/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">on my blog</a>, it has a nicer image/text layout.</p><p><strong>TL;DR</strong></p><ul><li>The initial problem was that ISP’s modem/router froze every day.</li><li>Synology is a good router with a responsive support. But –</li><li>The problem with Synology was responsiveness of my selfhosted webpages via browser/domain name.</li><li>The solution was an obscure setting that ‘improves compatibility of roaming of wifi clients’</li><li>I lost 1 week of time to deal with it.</li><li>Nevertheless, it pays off to have own router. Innobox was s**t.</li></ul><p><strong>The problem:</strong></p><p>My ISP’s (Telekom SI) modem/router (#Innobox G92) was having serious problems and ISP didn’t (want/know) how to fix it. It froze at least one time every day. It showed internet is connected, but it refused to transfer the data. Of course they (ISP) didn’t admit there is anything wrong with it. But I had logs in my HomeAssistant that showed exactly when the data transfer stopped.</p><p>They even replaced it and the new one started to behave exactly like the old one after only a week of use. They also blamed me – they said I should hire a ‘computer specialist’ to check my network. </p><p>I have only about 30 network devices. </p><p>So I decided (too late) that I want a router that I can control.</p><p>The next issue was some of my wifi gadgets didn’t have good wifi connection (e. g. in the basement). I used an old Linksys WRT54G as a separate access point, but I wanted a central management of all my gadgets.</p><p><strong>Synology – the solution to ISP’s modem/router connectivity, which itself became a problem</strong></p><p>I researched a bit and asked around, which routers are good nowadays. I heard about Ubiquity (and almost decided for it), Asus, TP-Link, OpenWRT (compatible) and Mikrotik. And Synology.</p><p>Finally I decided for a Synology. I have their NAS for 13 years, it has a nice UI, hasn’t failed yet and that was a deciding factor.</p><p>I went with their top offer: Synology RT6600ax router + WRX560 access point. </p><p>Installation of the router was dead easy. I just turned it on, connected to its wifi, created a user, connected WAN port to modem’s LAN port, called Telekom to put the modem in the bridge mode, entered PPPoE user/pass and voila, it worked.</p><p>SRM (the management UI) is really nice. I can see traffic by clients/protocols/apps/…</p><p>Wifi mesh access points and traffic:</p><p><strong>Issues with internal web pages load times … was it DNS?</strong></p><p>I tested the network a bit, added WRX560 as a mesh access point. And then the issues started. </p><p><strong>Internal web pages accessed via browser / domain names were slow or there was a timeout when loading.</strong> </p><p>It looks like the network doesn’t handle http/s request to internal web pages well AFTER adding wrx560 and creating a mesh. </p><p>Before adding WRX, the access to internal web pages was quick. Even before, when I was using only my ISP modem/router, everything was quick.</p><p>Firmware: SRM 1.3.1-9346 Update 12</p><p><strong>Symptoms: </strong></p><p>When I tried to load a webpage that is on my webserver in my LAN via my domain (e. g. this page, <a href="https://blog.rozman.info" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://blog.rozman.info</a> and some others), it took 1-30 seconds for a page to load (or there was a timeout). Especially if I reloaded the page in a sequence or clicked links on the same page in short time.</p><p><strong>Setup:</strong></p><p>GPON –&gt; Modem (bridge mode) –&gt; rt6600ax (router) –&gt; wrx560 (ap)</p><p>I have static IPv4 (and IPv6). My web domain points to the router static ip –&gt; port forwarding –&gt; reverse proxy (in my LAN) –&gt; web server (in my LAN).</p><p>If I connected wirelessly or wired directly to rt6600ax, <strong>there was no</strong> timeout or delay. If I accessed it from external network (e. g. via mobile data), <strong>no</strong> timeout or delay.</p><p>If I connected wirelessly or wired to the access point WRX, there <strong>WAS</strong> a delay or timeout. Even if I put wrx on the last place in lan (after a dumb switch) and connected to the same switch, there was a delay. It got worse if I clicked refresh on a web page quickly several times in a row.</p><p>I ran countless tests without success.</p><p>Everything else worked fast and ok. <strong>Speedtest showed 300/100 Mbs, ping was 2-5ms, traceroute was 3ms to my modem, dig was fine, nslookup was fine</strong>).</p><p>Response of the webpages via IP – also no problem – loaded quickly, under 100ms.</p><p>But when I accessed it via domain name, it stuttered. Browser / Developer mode / Network / Timings showed:</p><blockquote><p><strong><em>If the page loads quickly via IP and stutters via domain name … it must be DNS, right?</em></strong></p></blockquote><p>Then I wrote a little curl script that measures the response time to exclude browser issues:</p><pre><code><em><code>curl -w "\nDNS Lookup: %{time_namelookup}s\nConnect: %{time_connect}s\nStart Transfer: %{time_starttransfer}s\nTotal: %{time_total}s\n" -o /dev/null -s </code></em><a href="https://my.domain.ext" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><code><em>https://blog.rozman.info</em></code></a></code></pre><p>that returns (when it’s ok):</p><p><em>DNS Lookup: 0.005905s</em><br><em>Connect: 0.007009s</em><br><em>Start Transfer: 0.838036s</em><br><em>Total: 0.838527s</em></p><p>when it choked, it returned:</p><p><em>DNS Lookup: 0.008007s</em><br><em>Connect: 1.009419s</em> //or 2, 3, 10 seconds<br><em>Start Transfer: <strong>1.952299s</strong></em> //or 2, 3, 10 seconds<br><em>Total: <strong>1.952632s</strong></em></p><p>when there wasa timeout, it returned:</p><p><em>DNS Lookup: 0.006191s</em><br><em>Connect: 0.000000s //timeout</em><br><em>Start Transfer: 0.000000s //timeout</em><br><em>Total: <strong>21.034533s</strong></em></p><p>DNS lookup looks quick, but after that (waiting and connecting) it chokes.&nbsp;</p><p>It felt like that wrx560 (or mesh setup) added some kind of recursive loop to the (DNS?) request. NAT Loopback? I don’t know, I’m not a networking professional.</p><p><strong>Failed attempts</strong></p><p>I was desperate and tried many things without success:</p><ul><li>updated both devices</li><li>disconnected AP, reset, played with its settings, but when I added it back to the mesh, it reset to its factory state and AP mode anyways. After adding it to the mesh, it worked ok for a few minutes, then the issues returned. Repeated several times.</li><li>Tried to access AP, no success. I couldn’t figure it out how to access it. It’s not in the client list. I even connected it to the router via LAN instead of WAN port. I could see it (MAC address, no IP), but still couldn’t connect to it.</li><li>Checked my reverse proxy (nginx), optimized some buffering and caching</li><li>Enabled caching mods (mod_expire) on my webservers (apache)</li><li>turned off and on almost all settings I could find it in the router software.</li><li>Cleared the DNS cache countless times (ipconfig /flushdns in cmd and about:networking#dns –&gt; clear DNS cache in Firefox)</li><li>I even asked Mastodon community for help 🙂</li><li>In parallel, I contacted Synology’s support. They were helpful and response times were quick (24hrs).<ul><li>Firstly, they sent me some patches and I installed it on the router. No success.</li><li>Then they ‘adjusted something’ remotely. No success.</li><li>More remote ‘adjustments’.</li><li>Lastly, they ‘asked someone’ and gave me the final solution. But in the meantime, I found the workaround solution:</li></ul></li></ul><p><strong><strong>Temporary workaround</strong> solution – split DNS </strong></p><p>I temporary solved slow response/load times by adding my web site domain names to my local DNS records on my Pihole (‘split DNS’). I wasn’t very happy, because this is no real solution, only a bad workaround.&nbsp;But it worked.</p><p>I waited some more for the support to fix it.</p><p>At this moment I was sure I didn’t fuck it up. There must be something in the mesh setup that disturbes connection response.</p><p><strong>And finally:</strong></p><p>After a week of a chat with the support, they suggested to check out some obscure setting hidden deep in the menus and turn it off:</p><blockquote><p><strong>Control panel / System / SRM settings / Enhance the roaming compatibility of clients between Wi-Fi systems (turn it off).</strong></p></blockquote><p>AND IT WORKED!</p><p>Immediately after unchecking this setting, the my web pages became responsive. Whoah.</p><p>At the end, all good. </p><p>But then I started to play with IPv6… </p><p>till the next time!</p><p></p><p><strong>Disclaimer</strong></p><p>The links to the products (or mentioning them) are not affiliate links and I don’t receive any compensation for linking.</p><p></p><p>Hashtags:&nbsp;#synology #srm #homelab #mesh #selfhosting #dns #network</p><p><a href="https://blog.rozman.info/setting-up-a-synology-router-and-wifi-mesh-was-it-a-mistake/" class="" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://blog.rozman.info/setting-up-a-synology-router-and-wifi-mesh-was-it-a-mistake/</a></p><p><a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://blog.rozman.info/tag/dns/" target="_blank">#dns</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://blog.rozman.info/tag/homelab/" target="_blank">#homelab</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://blog.rozman.info/tag/mesh/" target="_blank">#mesh</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://blog.rozman.info/tag/network/" target="_blank">#network</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://blog.rozman.info/tag/selfhosting/" target="_blank">#selfhosting</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://blog.rozman.info/tag/srm/" target="_blank">#srm</a></p>
legraLeGra<p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/geoengineering" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>geoengineering</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/srm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>srm</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SolarRadiationManagement" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SolarRadiationManagement</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/sai" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>sai</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/StratosphericAerosolInjection" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>StratosphericAerosolInjection</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/nsf" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>nsf</span></a></p><p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.world/@davidho" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>davidho</span></a></span> </p><p>Is this the society part or the geoengineering part of the nsf panel getting deferred 'until further notice’?</p>
legraLeGra<p>One of my earliest, popular posts here on mastodon was about <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/geoengineering" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>geoengineering</span></a> through <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/srm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>srm</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SolarRadiationManagement" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SolarRadiationManagement</span></a> through <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/sai" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>sai</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/StratosphericAerosolInjection" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>StratosphericAerosolInjection</span></a> , or venture capitalist dudes from “Making Sunsets” tried to create fake Volcanoes in the stratosphere to cancel out some greenhouse gas fueled global warming.</p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/@atthenius/109577754208679865" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">fediscience.org/@atthenius/109</span><span class="invisible">577754208679865</span></a></p><p>Last fall <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/nsf" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>nsf</span></a> convened a panel of experts including scientists like me plus social scientists and policy makers— virtually so very low-cost -- to figure out the impact of such a program (as well as other geoengineering ideas for carbon capture and marine cloud brightening etc.) on the world.</p><p><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20241009024635/https://new.nsf.gov/events/exploring-ethics-societal-interactions-climate" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">web.archive.org/web/2024100902</span><span class="invisible">4635/https://new.nsf.gov/events/exploring-ethics-societal-interactions-climate</span></a></p><p>This email was in my inbox this morning, 'deferring' it indefinitely.</p><p>I hope someone IS INDEED convening these kinds of panels.</p><p>“Well this is modestly embarrassing.</p><p>I invited you to join a report-out from the NSF workshop you participated in last year and you kindly accepted.</p><p>You may be aware that there has been quite a lot of change at the NSF and other funding agencies following the recent alteration in administration. I have now been advised that the NSF will have to defer the report-out until further notice.</p><p>I know that the organising team are anxious to reconnect with the community and bring you up to speed. I can only offer my apologies for having wasted your time - like you I have very limited understanding of the current situation - but I will let you know as soon as things change.</p><p>With warm good wishes”</p>
EU_ScienceHub<p>RT by <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://respublicae.eu/@EU_ScienceHub" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>EU_ScienceHub</span></a></span>: Solar Radiation Modification: What’s at stake for society? </p><p>In this webinar, we examine social science aspects of the <a href="https://respublicae.eu/tags/SRM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SRM</span></a> debate. What are the perspectives and interests of some of the key stakeholders? </p><p> Join us on 3rd Feb.<br><a href="http://scientificadvice.eu/events/solar-radiation-modification-whats-at-stake-for-society/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">http://</span><span class="ellipsis">scientificadvice.eu/events/sol</span><span class="invisible">ar-radiation-modification-whats-at-stake-for-society/</span></a><br>---<br><a href="https://nitter.privacydev.net/EUScienceAdvice/status/1883801116972105956#m" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">nitter.privacydev.net/EUScienc</span><span class="invisible">eAdvice/status/1883801116972105956#m</span></a></p>
Science for Environment Policy<p>RT by <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://respublicae.eu/@SfEP" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>SfEP</span></a></span>: Solar Radiation Modification: What’s at stake for society? </p><p>In this webinar, we examine social science aspects of the <a href="https://respublicae.eu/tags/SRM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SRM</span></a> debate. What are the perspectives and interests of some of the key stakeholders? </p><p> Join us on 3rd Feb.<br><a href="http://scientificadvice.eu/events/solar-radiation-modification-whats-at-stake-for-society/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">http://</span><span class="ellipsis">scientificadvice.eu/events/sol</span><span class="invisible">ar-radiation-modification-whats-at-stake-for-society/</span></a><br>---<br><a href="https://nitter.privacydev.net/EUScienceAdvice/status/1883801116972105956#m" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">nitter.privacydev.net/EUScienc</span><span class="invisible">eAdvice/status/1883801116972105956#m</span></a></p>
RiffReporter<p>Wie weit dürfen wir gehen, um das <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Klima" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Klima</span></a> zu retten? Solares <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Geoengineering" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Geoengineering</span></a> könnte das <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Wetter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Wetter</span></a> kontrollieren. Aber zu welchem Preis? Expertïnnen warnen vor den Risiken. Ist es unsere letzte Chance oder ein gefährlicher Weg? Von Tomma Schröder <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/SRM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SRM</span></a> 2/3 <a href="https://www.riffreporter.de/de/wissen/solares-geoengineering-sonnenverdunkelung-klimawandel-technologie-ethik" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">riffreporter.de/de/wissen/sola</span><span class="invisible">res-geoengineering-sonnenverdunkelung-klimawandel-technologie-ethik</span></a></p>
65dBnoise<p>EU scientific advisers:</p><p>"[T]he EU now needs to show global leadership in pushing for an international ‘non-deployment’ regime on solar radiation modification (<a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/SRM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SRM</span></a>)"</p><p>“Even if some of these proposals could address the symptoms of climate change, they do not address the cause"</p><p>The EU has to ensure "[…] that public funding does not take away from the money being spent to cut greenhouse gas pollution and adapt to a hotter planet."</p><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/dec/09/eu-should-ban-space-mirrors-and-other-solar-geoengineering-warn-scientists" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">theguardian.com/environment/20</span><span class="invisible">24/dec/09/eu-should-ban-space-mirrors-and-other-solar-geoengineering-warn-scientists</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ClimateCrisis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ClimateCrisis</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ClimateChange" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ClimateChange</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Politics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Politics</span></a></p>
A.A. Delafin, blackguard<p>It's called <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/Bluesky" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Bluesky</span></a> because techbros are building the replacement for when our actual blue sky will turn hazy orange due to <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/SolarRadiationManagement" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SolarRadiationManagement</span></a><br><a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/Dystopia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Dystopia</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/SRM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SRM</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/Geoengineering" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Geoengineering</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/ClimateCrisis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ClimateCrisis</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/ClimateDiary" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ClimateDiary</span></a></p>
Umweltbundesamt<p>We are deeply concerned about Solar Radiation Modification (SRM) being normalised. There are two side-events on SRM during <a href="https://social.bund.de/tags/COP29" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>COP29</span></a>: <a href="https://encr.pw/QSkbF" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">encr.pw/QSkbF</span><span class="invisible"></span></a>.<br><a href="https://social.bund.de/tags/SRM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SRM</span></a> is not <a href="https://social.bund.de/tags/climateaction" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>climateaction</span></a> and comes with enormous risks. More on the risks of solar geoengineering: <br><a href="https://encr.pw/y1ygn" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">encr.pw/y1ygn</span><span class="invisible"></span></a>  <br>  <br> <br>Screenshot: LinkedIn-Profil <br><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/degrees-initiative_cop29-activity-7254472667154571265-6jsH" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">linkedin.com/posts/degrees-ini</span><span class="invisible">tiative_cop29-activity-7254472667154571265-6jsH</span></a></p>
anlomedad<p><a href="https://www.tagesspiegel.de/wissen/durren-fluten-tornados-muss-die-menschheit-den-klimawandel-mit-geoengineering-bekampfen-12582452.html" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">tagesspiegel.de/wissen/durren-</span><span class="invisible">fluten-tornados-muss-die-menschheit-den-klimawandel-mit-geoengineering-bekampfen-12582452.html</span></a></p><p>2 Ökonomen + 1 Physiker sagen hier ihre Meinung zu CDR und SRM. <br>Wie kann man allen Ernstes zu diesem Thema Ökonomen befragen?? Die wären die letzten, die zur Einordnung dieser Maßnahmen Gehör bekommen dürfen, da irrelevant, systematisch uninformiert und systematisch ethically challenged. <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/%C3%96konObsz%C3%B6n" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ÖkonObszön</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/SRM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SRM</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/CDR" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>CDR</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/Klima" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Klima</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/GeoEngineering" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GeoEngineering</span></a></p>
legraLeGra<p>Today I am participating in a NSF Workshop on <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Climate" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Climate</span></a> Interventions using <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SRM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SRM</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SolarRadiationManagement" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SolarRadiationManagement</span></a></p><p>They are pairing up climate scientists like me with <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SBE" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SBE</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SocialBehavioralEconomic" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SocialBehavioralEconomic</span></a> researchers</p><p>To try to figure out the ethics, governance, etc. of <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/geoengineering" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>geoengineering</span></a> our way out of <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ClimateChange" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ClimateChange</span></a></p><p><a href="https://new.nsf.gov/events/exploring-ethics-societal-interactions-climate" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">new.nsf.gov/events/exploring-e</span><span class="invisible">thics-societal-interactions-climate</span></a></p><p>Here is what I said previously about doing the fake-volcano method:</p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/@atthenius/109577754208679865" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">fediscience.org/@atthenius/109</span><span class="invisible">577754208679865</span></a></p>
anlomedad<p>Ha! This is the most interesting climate-related video I have seen to date. <br><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TB9nGlLVXeE" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">youtube.com/watch?v=TB9nGlLVXe</span><span class="invisible">E</span></a><br><a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/DanMiller" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>DanMiller</span></a> on <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/ClimateChat" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ClimateChat</span></a> hosts <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@weatherwest" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>weatherwest</span></a></span> <br>and they talk about extremes. Only about extremes. Where they come from, physically, where they will occur.</p><p>One reason why this is the most interesting video: it does not touch global mean changes at all. And thus, as Daniel also repeatedly says, is only about what really happens at ground zero. <br>Another reason is Daniel's extreme eloquence and holistic knowledge, and his ability to draw in facts and explanations from all sorts of areas in order to make a point or answer Dan's question.<br>I had several 💡 -moments, takeaways I hadn't known of or considered before. </p><p>At about minute 50 or so, SRM is discussed (as often on ClimateChat). And to listen to especially Daniel's thoughts on this is particularly valuable because he is who he is. <br>(His host is pro-SRM I think, and not satisfied with Daniel's holistically presented facts and personal opinions on the matter.)</p><p>One question wrt the rule of +1°C = 7% more water vapour in the air. <br>These +1°C are global mean. <br>But what the water and energy system actually draws from in places is not +1C GMT. <br>It finds 2.5C to 3.5C in summer in Germany. <br>In the Adria, Mediterranean it was +5C this summer (which caused Eastern Europe to drown). <br>So, in the case of +2.5C on land, doesn't this automatically also translate to an increase in water vapour to 19%?<br>Including the atmosphere's thirst for water evaporating from soil and plants, ie drought risk?</p><p>American units mentioned:<br>80°F = 26°C<br>90°F = 32°C<br>30 inch: 760mm<br>40,000 feet = 12km</p><p><a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/ClimateCrisis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ClimateCrisis</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/ExtremeWeather" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ExtremeWeather</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/SRM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SRM</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/flooding" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>flooding</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/heavyRains" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>heavyRains</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/ExtremeHeat" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ExtremeHeat</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/Heatwave" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Heatwave</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/drought" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>drought</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/meteorology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>meteorology</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/weather" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>weather</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/wildfire" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>wildfire</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/hurricane" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>hurricane</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/storm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>storm</span></a></p>
Paul Wermer, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://threads.net/@earthlyeducation/" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>earthlyeducation</span></a></span> </p><p>Wait - doesn't this mean <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/SolarRadiationManagement" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SolarRadiationManagement</span></a> won't solve GHG emission problems? That we'll actually have to stop burning fossil fuels? That there isn't a magical technosolution?</p><p><a href="https://sfba.social/tags/SRM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SRM</span></a></p>