@amerpie LYT kit by @nickmilo has some great concepts and is easy to tweak https://forum.obsidian.md/t/ideaverse-for-obsidian-formerly-the-lyt-kit-now-available/390
@amerpie LYT kit by @nickmilo has some great concepts and is easy to tweak https://forum.obsidian.md/t/ideaverse-for-obsidian-formerly-the-lyt-kit-now-available/390
This week’s new Obsidian plugins are wild:
CmdSearch
Smart ChatGPT
LLM Test Generator
WordCraft
Git Changelog
Docusaurus Admonitions
8 more brilliant tools!
Read the full showcase → https://obsidianjourney.com/posts/obsidian-plugins-showcase---may-7th-2025/
#obsidian #plugins #obsidianmd #toolsforthought #smartnotes #SecondBrain @obsdmd
#obsidian #ObsidianMD #secondbrain #type/note #note #NoteTaking @obsidian @obsidianmd@a.gup.pe @obsidianmd@lemmy.world
Trying to decide: Obsidian.md or Logseq — which one is the ultimate tool for knowledge management and note-taking?
Both have their strengths, but I’m curious:
Which do you use and why?
Pros, cons, hidden features — let’s discuss!
Many of us have been on this quest for years now.
#toolsforthought have to be multi-player to support the networked orgs that exist throughout our family, personal, and professional lives.
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:ad5bwszsc5m5jpj2sfa6uzjk/post/3limsv4fhgc2a
I wrote recently about #AI for IA (intelligence augmentation) and it looks like Stanford is paying attention. ;-)
"We encourage the university to view goals in this space in line with the philosophy of Stanford’s Institute for Human-Centered AI (HAI) to make sure that the use of AI is centered on improving the human condition. Thus, we prefer to focus on “augmenting human capabilities” versus “replacing humans.”"
https://provost.stanford.edu/2025/01/09/report-of-the-ai-at-stanford-advisory-committee/
I asked STORM for an article on #Augmentation of Human Intellect and Tools for the Extended Mind.
"Inventing on principle" by @bret@dynamic.land.social
"outlines principles for designing cognitive tools"
Free PDF of my ebook, Mind Amplifier
I first heard of "the extended mind" via cognitive philosopher Andy Clark. I interviewed him in 2011:
2012 interview about my ebook, Mind Amplifier
Prompt: With concepts of extended mind, cultural technologies, augmentation of human intellect, work of David Chalmers, Doug Engelbart, Howard Rheingold, Robert K. Logan, Alison Gopnik in mind, describe in detail how large language models can be used as tools for thought. Include examples & skills necessary to learn in order to master this use of large language models.
#ai #ToolsForThought #technology #mind
chatGPT:https://chatgpt.com/share/6750e18f-542c-8007-aecb-24937286215c
Закончил чтение замечательной книги Building a Second Brain. Несмотря на то, что большинством описанных методик давно пользуюсь, всё равно нашел много полезного для себя.
Как советует автор в конце книги, делюсь своими top takeaways и highlights:
- 12 problems
- Progressive Summarization
- Archipelago of Ideas
- Hemingway Bridge
- Put ideas into action
- Dial Down the Scope
- Intermediate Packets
Diesen Freitag geht es für @davidlohner und mich an die @unieichstaett
Wir freuen uns schon sehr auf unseren Kurs: Digitale #Denkwerkzeuge gewinnbringend in der #Lehre einsetzen. Lehrbezogenes #Wissensmanagement systematischer, effizienter und nachhaltiger gestalten
https://weiterbildung.ku.de/goto.php?target=cat_336&client_id=weiterbildung
Use Whatever Works. Why You Don’t Need a Sophisticated System for Effective Knowledge Management.
To promote effective PKM, consider the following:
1. Start Simple
2. Be Intentional with Tools and Features
3. Focus on Concepts and Practices, Not Tools
Read more: https://doi.org/10.58079/12jbw
NotebookLLM in #education is important for #teaching
and #learning with #ai and a big step for #ToolsForThought
Sign up for online seminar:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScqq7daka5vDFAkt9CuOjIiyQtVcxIB88Nc3ldZCs8pljxxlw/viewform
Call for Speakers for Clojure/Conj 2024 is open on Sessionize and I've just submitted a session! https://sessionize.com/clojureconj-2024/ #toolsforthought
“We apply theories of human cognitive capabilities and limitations to understand how computers can best provide such cognitive support. The interdisciplinary nature of this work is reflected in the term cognitive engineering.”
Writing some "integration" or "system" tests for my [WikidProject](https://one.mikro2nd.net/pages/wikid-intro/), wherein one wiki instance copies/syncs tagged pages to a designated server. (No code, yet, just sketching out tests, because tdd...)
Design is such that I have a WikiEngine that does all the real work, and a thin HTTP wrapper around that to provide the transport.
So which should I test with? The Engine or the HTTP server (along with all the URL/string wrangling implied).